Analytics

• Careless losses

  4

  Easier questions answered in under 50% of the time available for one, and got wrong. These are the cheapest marks to win back.

• Overthought

  3

  Questions that took more than 200% of their budget and were still wrong. That time was never going to pay.

• Answered very fast

  4%

  Answers faster than a fifth of the time most students take on that question — or, for questions fewer than 30 students have answered, under 20% of the time available. A high rate means the score owes something to luck.

• Time on wrong answers

  21 min

  Spent on questions that did not score. Not wasted — but worth knowing where it went.

You changed 11 answers. You scored 55% on those against 74% on the ones you left alone.

A module ran out of time, so this reflects pacing as well as knowledge.

Descriptive, not predictive: it says where the marks went on this sitting and how the time was spent. It does not claim to know what you would score on test day.

• Reading and Writing · Module 11m 2s typical, against a 1m 11s budget

  27 questions in 32m. 7 questions ran over budget, the longest at 3m 9s.

• Reading and Writing · Module 21m 14s typical, against a 1m 11s budget

  27 questions in 32m. 11 questions ran over budget, the longest at 4m 1s. 1 left unanswered — the clock ran out.

• Math · Module 11m 21s typical, against a 1m 35s budget

  22 questions in 35m. 5 questions ran over budget, the longest at 4m 36s.

• Math · Module 21m 32s typical, against a 1m 35s budget

  22 questions in 35m. 8 questions ran over budget, the longest at 5m 12s.

Measured from the time between a question appearing and its last answer change, per module. Time spent on a question you returned to is counted once, against that question.

A cause describes what you DID on a slow question — came back to it, flagged it, read for a long time before answering. Nothing here observes how you read. One row per question you were served, in the order you saw them. Budget is the module's own clock divided by its question count.

• Did not know how11 (42%)

  These are the ones lessons fix. More timed practice will not.

• Ran out of time7 (27%)

  You knew these. Timed drills, not more content.

• Misread the question5 (19%)

  Cheapest marks on the board — the knowledge was already there.

• Slipped3 (12%)

  Mechanical errors. Slowing down on the last step usually does it.

Most of what you lose comes from did not know how.

From the misses you classified yourself after each sitting, across every mock. Nothing here is inferred — a miss you did not classify is not counted. 14 of these matched what your blind review suggested.